Las Vegas real estate, mortgage, appraisal blog

Are foreclosures and price decline hurting our economic recovery?
January 27th, 2010 3:51 PM

It's a valid question and one that many have been asking themselves lately. Drive through most neighborhoods and you'll find at least one price reduced home, if not several. Depending on the area it might be nestled between foreclosed homes. An article in HousingWire asked this same question and got some surprising answers.

Declines in house prices mixed with increases in foreclosures are not showing a hugely negative knock-on impact for the nation’s overall economic recovery, according to a weekly report by FTN Financial, a portfolio manager and analytics provider for the investment and banking industry.

The announcement comes as recent housing data speaks otherwise and appears to fail to fulfill hopes of a broad recovery.

FTN reached its conclusion based on an examination of local sales tax data, which shows that even in the absence of available housing-backed capital, such as the once-popular home equity lines of credit, consumers are still buying in a way that can’t be measured against the backdrop of local foreclosures and price declines.

“Local housing prices and poor credit by themselves do not solely determine participation in the recovery so far,” said Jim Vogel, a financial analyst at FTN and author of the weekly report. “While housing contributed to the downturn, it is not an absolute roadblock to recovery.”

Vogel notes that economic growth in the past three business cycles was led by confidence in consumer spending, and supported by gains from refinanced first mortgages and new second lien home equity loans. But the extent of the decline in the housing and mortgage markets from 2007-2009 calls into question the speed and sustainability of the current recovery.

For the report, FTN analyzed state sales tax receipts in the second half of 2009 in particularly hard-hit metropolitan areas, and compared the data with more stable housing economies. FTN concluded that spending recovery patterns are not necessarily worse in regions with the worst housing markets.

The housing market in Florida, for example may have high foreclosures and mixed with dropping home prices, but when it comes whether or not this impacts the spending habits of the state’s inhabitants, there appears to be a “zero correlation,” the reports states.

“[S]ales tax receipts were uncorrelated in 2H 2009 with housing misery,” Vogel said. “That has led to a tentative conclusion that continued home price declines and foreclosures are not fatal to the overall economic recovery.”

FTN also concluded the economy grew in the second half of the year despite tight mortgage lending standards. The growth was largely driven by federal stimulus, although consumer spending contributed as well.


Posted by Leah Barr on January 27th, 2010 3:51 PMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
FHA making changes to avoid bailout
January 20th, 2010 2:44 PM

In an effort to avoid a taxpayer bailout the FHA will be tightening its lending standards and raising fees. This in an effort to help shore up those same strapped finances it claimed would not need any help from taxpayers back in October of 2009. An article from MSNBC shows some details on the changes that the FHA hopes will keep them from needing any assistance.

The new policies, are designed to bring more revenue into the agency, while at the same time keeping loans available.

Under the changes, homebuyers will:

  • Pay an upfront mortgage insurance premium of 2.25 percent of the total loan amount, up from the current level of 1.75 percent. A borrower taking out a $200,000 mortgage would pay a $4,500 fee, for example, rather than the current fee of $3,500. Borrowers will still be able to wrap these fees into the total amount borrowed. FHA officials also plan to ask Congress to increase the maximum annual premium that FHA can charge.
  • Need a credit score of at least 580 to qualify. Many FHA lenders already require a higher score, but there had been no standard requirement across the program. Borrowers with a score lower than 580 will need a down payment of at least 10 percent.

The changes come as borrowers with loans backed by the agency have increasingly been falling into default. More than 18 percent of FHA borrowers are at least one payment behind or in foreclosure, compared with 14 percent for all loans, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association.

The FHA is also cracking down on those they think may be involved in less than honest lending practices.

There also have been fears that unscrupulous operators have shifted their business to the FHA after the subprime business went bust. Last week, the agency served subpoenas on 15 mortgage companies with suspiciously high default rates for FHA loans, part of a broad crackdown on dubious lenders.

The agency has already taken action against several problem lenders. One of the nation's biggest mortgage bankers, Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Co. of Ocala, Fla., was banned from the FHA program in August and filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. Another mortgage company, Lend America, was kicked out in November.

Interestingly this all comes in the wake of news that HUD is going to be waiving an FHA rule on reselling. Reuters had the details in a recent article.

Effective Feb 1, the Housing and Urban Development Department will waive for one year an FHA rule that prohibits insuring a mortgage on a home owned by the seller for less than 90 days, giving FHA borrowers access to a broader array of recently foreclosed properties.

The move is to allow homes to resell as quickly as possible, helping stabilize real estate prices and revitalize neighborhoods after the U.S. housing market collapse.

"This change in policy is temporary and will have very strict conditions and guidelines to assure that predatory practices are not allowed," HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan said.

FHA research shows acquiring, rehabilitating and reselling foreclosed properties to prospective homeowners often takes less than 90 days, HUD said.

The current rule discourages sellers from signing contracts with FHA buyers because of holding costs and the risks of vandalism from allowing a property to sit vacant more than 90 days, the department said.

"FHA borrowers, because of the restrictions we are now lifting, have often been shut out from buying affordable properties," said FHA Commissioner David Stevens.

The policy change will permit buyers to use FHA-insured financing to purchase HUD-owned properties, bank-owned properties or properties resold through private sales.



Posted by Leah Barr on January 20th, 2010 2:44 PMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
Treasury puts focus on local housing agencies
January 14th, 2010 3:31 PM

I'm not sure what to think of this article. I know what I usually think when I'm told that a new government plan/initiative/expansion of resources isn't supposed to cost more to taxpayers. That is, however, exactly what is being said about the new HFA or Housing Finance Agency Initiative which is being discussed in today's article in HousingWire.

The HFA Initiative is a key element to the Obama Administration’s Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan, which attempts to expand resources for low-to-middle income borrowers to purchase or rent homes. The Treasury does not expect the Initiative to come at a cost to taxpayers, according to the announcement.

In October, the Treasury announced two parts of the initiative, the New Issue Bond Program (NIBP) to support new lending by the HFAs, and the Temporary Credit and Liquidity Program (TCLP) to deliver relief to the agencies’ financial strains.

Through more than 90 participating HFA’s, the Treasury attempts to provide affordable financing to “hundreds of thousands” of borrowers to purchase, rehabilitate or refinance a home. The HFA’s will also provide multifamily loans to keep rents affordable for borrowers.

“Supporting the work of state and local HFAs is critical to the Administration’s broader initiative to stabilize the housing market, which is helping to keep mortgage rates low and mortgage finance flowing for American households across the country,” said Treasury secretary Tim Geithner.

Susan Dewey, president of the National Council of State Housing Agencies (NCSHA) and executive director of the Virginia Housing Development Authority said that the bond proceeds from the recently completed transactions, coupled with the $7.7bn in retail housing bonds issued by the state HFAs allows the agencies to finance more than 200,000 homes.

So I still don't know what to think. I know a lot of you are watching the purchases due to the tax credit and wondering what will happen when July 1st rolls around. Now with this initiative, will it help or artificially promote purchasing only to fall flat once it's over? What do you think? Feel free to comment on this, ask questions or even weigh in with opinions on any of our blog posts.


Posted by Leah Barr on January 14th, 2010 3:31 PMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
Sales rising while critics balk at government involvement
January 6th, 2010 4:32 PM

No one can deny that sales have risen since the involvement of the government in the real estate market. The steady rise in sales over this period of time looks only to increase over the next few months, according to HousingWire, as the tax credit has been extended until April 30th.

“It will be at least early spring before we see notable gains in sales activity as home buyers respond to the recently extended and expanded tax credit,” said NAR chief economist Lawrence Yun. “The fact that pending home sales are comfortably above year-ago levels shows the market has gained sufficient momentum on its own. We expect another surge in the spring as more home buyers take advantage of affordable housing conditions before the tax credit expires.”

The homebuyer tax credit was extended and now buyers must have a contract in place by April 30 and close by June 30 of this year. Yun said mortgage rates will likely increase slightly this year, but buyers looking to take advantage of the tax credit will create an uncharacteristic surge in springtime home buying activity.

“Many trade-up buyers, who have historically timed their purchase based on school-year considerations, will have to accelerate their buying plans if they need the tax credit to make a trade,” Yun said.

Another HousingWire article discussed how the Las Vegas/Clark County area is responding to the change in the housing sector.

The volume of November home sales in Las Vegas trailed off 5.5% from October, but spiked 44% from the start of 2009, according a report from MDA DataQuick.

The San Diego-based information provider said the home sale surge comes from the usual factors: price declines, low mortgage rates and the federal tax credit for homebuyers.

Foreclosure resales continued to dominate the Vegas housing market but also continue to gradually decline, according to MDA DataQuick. In November, 64.2% of homes and condos in Las Vegas were foreclosure resales, down from 66.8% in October and 68.1% below levels seen in November 2008. In April 2009, foreclosure sales peaked, taking up 73.7% of the region’s sales activity, but that percentage has declined every month since — perhaps as lenders and servicers have held up foreclosure activity.

The 4,787 new and resale homes and condos was the highest number of sales for a Vegas November since 2006, when 5,803 homes sold. November marked the 15th consecutive month that sales increased from one year earlier.

The region’s median sales price continued to fall on a year-over-year basis — marking 31 consecutive months of declining prices — and by November, it stood 56.8% below its $312,000 peak, recorded in November 2006. This November, the median price paid for all new and resale houses reached $134,900, up 3.8% from October but down sharply 29% from $190,000 last year.

What exactly is all this government involvement doing? According to an article in NuWireInvestor the government involvement is slowly making things even worse.

The so-called recovery in housing has been boosted by artificial government actions. The Fed has kept interest rates at historically low levels at between 0%-0.25%. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have been bailed-out at levels that are setting new records to keep them in business and provide a base for mortgage financing in the U.S. The government is offering first time home buyers an $8,000 tax credit and those who haven't bought a home in five years $6,500. And lastly the Fed is buying up billions of dollars of mortgage securities.

At no other time has the government been so involved in real estate like it is in the current crisis, and there's more to come from the White House in February before the president offers the annual State of the Union Address.

But before any real stabilization will develop many of the artificial protections for the market have to come off. The tax credit will expire April 30th. The Treasury will have to stop buying securities that back-up mortgages. The Fed will eventually have to raise interest rates. The hint of higher rates by the Fed will cause bankers to increase home lending rates before the Fed ever makes an announcement. That's how it works in money markets.

Sooner or later the government will be forced to deal with whether it will nationalize Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. There are already eager suitors waiting in line, but any take over these days would come at a massive cost to tax payers, who own the majority of the stake in both government sponsored entities by the sheer volume of money that it's taking to keep them operating.

The climb out of the mortgage mess is expected to take at least four or five years before the government acts to make a decision on Fannie and Freddie.

The government's housing rescue package has been orchestrated by federal policy makers with little public transparency. As part of the program bankers have been given financial incentives to modify mortgages, but the plan has been deemed a failure. Still, bankers are provided with incentives to work out a short sale or have homeowners sign a deed in lieu of foreclosure.

The foreclosure epidemic has led to the worst economy since the Great Depression, despite economic improvements in some business sectors. In order for the housing market to stabilize the huge number of unemployed will have to go back to work in order to qualify to become homeowners. At its very core the nation is under-going a huge shift in the government paradigm controlling the mortgage market.

The shift is painful for millions of Americans, who are unemployed, under-employed or losing their homes. As usual the government has done very little for the majority of those suffering through the crisis. But the shift to new standards will slowly transform the culture of investing both in real estate and other investments to a new understanding of the nation's future.

 


Posted by Leah Barr on January 6th, 2010 4:32 PMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
Financial reform bill passes in the House
December 14th, 2009 5:30 PM

The bill that we told you about last month, financial reform that could dismantle companies that the Government deems too large, passed the House on Friday. It is now being sent to the Senate. An article on TheStreet had quite a bit to say about this turn of events.

The bill, which passed along party lines (223-202) and will now advance to the Senate, covers everything from consumer protections, to governmental authority to dismantle banking behemoths during times of crisis, to heightened oversight of the trading of complex financial derivatives and the activities of hedge funds.

"The crisis from which we are still recovering was born not only of failure on Wall Street, but also in Washington," President Obama said. "We have a responsibility to learn from it and to put in place reforms that will promote sound investment, encourage real competition and innovation and prevent such a crisis from ever happening again. "

One of the most significant elements of the bill is the formation of a Financial Services Oversight Council -- comprised of the Treasury secretary, the Federal Reserve chairman and the chiefs of regulatory agencies -- designed to track the financial markets for systemic risks.

If the bill becomes law, the government could take apart any firm that it believes poses a dangerous enough threat to the banking system and the economy. Firms with assets of more than $50 billion, and hedge funds with at least $10 billion in assets, would contribute to a $150 billion pool that would cover the costs of disassembling such a company.

So any firm, bank and hedge fund will not only be watched like a hawk, but will have to contribute to their own dissembling should they look dangerous.

 


Posted by Leah Barr on December 14th, 2009 5:30 PMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
New governmental powers being proposed
November 19th, 2009 1:47 PM

The concept of "too big to fail" companies has been a controversy for a while now, especially considering the events of the past two years. Wednesday a House committee voted on adding legislation that would enable the government the rather extraordinary power to break up large financial firms that they deem would pose a potential risk to the economy. There is debate over whether or not this power is excessive, according to an article in the LA Times.

The proposal by Rep. Paul E. Kanjorski (D-Pa.) would allow regulators to break up such big companies before their failure becomes imminent. It goes beyond the powers requested by the Obama administration to seize large firms on the brink of failure should their collapse threaten to damage the wider financial system.

"I recognize this is extraordinary power. Hopefully it will never have to be used," Kanjorski said. It would be used only if other regulatory measures did not reduce the potential threat of "huge, megalopolis-like" companies failing, he said. 

A new council of financial regulators would have authority to dismantle large operations. Under the plan, the forced divestiture of assets worth more than $10 billion could not take place without the Treasury secretary's approval. The forced divestiture of more than $100 billion would require consultation with the president.

The House Financial Services Committee voted 38 to 29 to add Kanjorski's proposal to legislation that would grant federal regulators so-called resolution authority to dissolve large financial firms teetering near bankruptcy. 

The Obama administration said it needs the authority to avoid situations such as last year's collapse of giant insurer American International Group Inc. The Federal Reserve bailed out the insurance giant because officials feared the economic chaos from a bankruptcy would have reverberated through financial markets worldwide.

The committee is expected to approve the broader legislation today.

There is quite a bit of opposition to this power and not everyone is on board.

Republicans on the committee strongly opposed the new breakup power, calling it "draconian" and "unconstitutional."

"When the government says you are too big and we're going to make you dismantle, that is a taking of private property rights in this country," said Rep. Randy Neugebauer (R-Texas). 

Large financial firms also adamantly oppose the proposal. Jamie Dimon, chief executive of JPMorgan Chase & Co., said last week that he endorsed enacting resolution authority to allow for the orderly dismantling of a large financial company on the brink of collapse. But he said financial firms should not be capped, in part because they would not be able to compete with huge banks based in other countries.

Still, the idea of breaking up financial giants before they can pose a threat to the system is gaining momentum.

Former Federal Reserve Chairmen Paul Volcker and Alan Greenspan recently endorsed the idea, as did the head of the Bank of England. Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher J. Dodd (D-Conn.) proposes similar power in his bill to overhaul financial regulations.

But the Obama administration has been cool to the idea, preferring to force tougher regulations on huge financial firms, such as requiring them to hold more money as a cushion against losses. Under the administration's proposal, a firm would be broken up only when its collapse was imminent.

What is your take on the issue? Please feel free to comment.

 


Posted by Leah Barr on November 19th, 2009 1:47 PMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
Extended homebuyer credit in effect
November 10th, 2009 7:58 AM

Friday marked the signing of the Worker, Homeownership and Business Act of 2009 by President Obama, with the intended benefit of extending the first-time homebuyer tax credit as well as certain unemployment benefits. This could not come at a more critical time as the US unemployment rate has exceeded 10%. Housingwire had the following information on what it would mean for borrowers.

With the first-time homebuyer tax credit originally scheduled to expire on Dec. 1, 2009, HR 3548 now allows first-time buyers to claim 10% of the purchase price of their home, up to $8,000 for single or married taxpayers filing jointly, if they close on the purchase by midnight June 30, 2010. Taxpayers must purchase or be locked into a contract to close before midnight on April 30, 2010.

The credit has provided more than 1.4m to taxpayers as of September 2009, according to the Internal Revenue Service.

New provisions accompany the extension. The credit is allowed for those with incomes up to $125,000 or $225,000 for taxpayers filing jointly. The credit reduces for those with incomes between $125,000 and $145,000 - or $225,000 and $245,000 if filing jointly. Anyone with an income higher than $145,000, $245,000 if filing jointly, cannot not receive credit.

Taxpayers who have lived in their home for five consecutive years during the eight years before closing on a new home may qualify for a reduced credit - $6,500 joint filers and $3,250 for those who file jointly.

The bill passed the House of Representatives on September 22, 2009, with 331 votes for and 83 votes against. When the bill landed in the Senate, it passed with 98 votes for and 0 votes against.

Homebuilders seem to be viewing this as an opportune time to start expansion again. Many foreclosure filled areas are being bought up as prices have fallen. MSNBC reported that places such as Southern California, Orlando, FL and here in Las Vegas are now showing more stability and that competition is building for the more choice lots.

"In the past, (builders) had really been the ones that had been feeding the market and selling lots to investors," said Tom Dallape, a principal at The Hoffman Co., a land brokerage firm based in Irvine, Calif. "Now all of a sudden they are rushing back in."

Major players such as Ryland Group Inc. and Meritage Homes Corp., are among those that jumped into the fray.

Meritage recently signed contracts to buy 2,500 lots spread out over new communities in several states, including California. The builder plans to open nine new communities this year or early next.

This summer, Ryland bought land or signed option contracts to do so in several markets, including Indianapolis, Atlanta, Houston, Las Vegas and Baltimore.

"We are pursuing more deals than at any time in the past several years," said CEO Larry Nicholson. 

Builders are primarily looking for land in areas that are already cleared for home construction. That way, they will be ready to build and sell in just a few months.

In May, Trumark Homes bought 39 lots in Upland, Calif., where it plans to build homes early next year.

The Irvine-based company bought the land — which already had paved streets and utility connections ready for construction — for less money than the previous developer owed the bank.

The previous owner planned to build and sell homes in the $500,000-range. Trumark's homes will be priced $200,000 less.

"We were able to get the land for free and the improvements they made we got at like 45 cents on the dollar," said Michael Maples, Trumark's chief executive. "The market changed."

 


Posted by Leah Barr on November 10th, 2009 7:58 AMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
Senate has agreed to extend the homebuyer tax credit
October 29th, 2009 4:00 PM

An article from on MSNBC noted that Senators agreed yesterday to extend the very popular tax credit for first-time homebuyers and to expand it as well.

The tax credit provides up to $8,000 to first-time homebuyers but is set to expire at the end of November.

Senators agreed to extend the existing tax credit for first-time homebuyers while offering a reduced credit of up to $6,500 to repeat buyers who have owned their current homes for at least five years, said Regan Lachapelle, a spokeswoman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev.

The tax credits would be available to homebuyers who sign sales agreements by the end of April. They would have until the end of June to close on their new homes, said a congressional aide, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to publicly discuss the deal.

Senators were still negotiating the expansion of a separate tax credit that lets money-losing businesses get refunds for taxes paid in previous years, providing them with an immediate source of cash.

Senators in both political parties were hoping to add both tax provisions to a bill that would give people running out of unemployment insurance benefits up to 20 more weeks of federal aid. The Senate could vote on the overall bill as early as Thursday, but lawmakers were still haggling over several unrelated amendments Wednesday evening.

Popular bills like the one to extend unemployment benefits often attract amendments that would have a difficult time passing on their own.

Republicans were demanding that they be given a chance to offer amendments to restrict federal aid to the beleaguered community activist group ACORN and on requiring that people receiving unemployment insurance be processed through E-Verify, an Internet-based system that employers use to check on the immigration status of new hires.

Majority Democrats have refused to add the amendments.


Posted by Leah Barr on October 29th, 2009 4:00 PMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
Affordable housing in California becomes even more so
October 27th, 2009 2:22 PM

The development of affordable housing in California has received a boost as the US Treasury Department announced that it will be allocating nearly $284 million. This is part of the more than $3 billion that has been distributed to state housing agencies in order to help fund these kinds of projects, an article in HousingWire explained.

The Treasury Department announced the allocation of nearly $284m in American Recovery and Reinvestment Act to spur affordable housing development in California.

The funds are the latest in more than $3.1bn given to housing agencies in 45 states and Puerto Rico in lieu of tax credits to fund affordable housing projects.

“This innovative Recovery Act program allows the federal government to partner with states to support local developers and helps ensure that housing developers can access the financing necessary to build affordable housing,” said Treasury deputy secretary Neal Wolin.

“We have worked quickly to make available more than $3 billion to state housing agencies, and we expect to see continued efforts at the state level, so that these funds can be delivered to the communities that need it most,” Wolin added.

The program began in May, and after state housing agencies are notified they will receive funds, each agency manages a competitive process for disbursing the funds to developers.

Florida is the leading recipient of funds, with more than $580m given to the state’s housing agency. North Dakota received the least among participating states, with about $3.7m given.

In other news, a Wall Street Journal article on Homeowners walking away was very enlightening. Hearing straight from the borrowers mouth proved to be as well, as evidenced in the comments.

The banks (my lender is     ) are unwilling to modify mortgages for the people able to pay. I suspect if the people underwater, but with money and good credit - you know, responsible people - were able to secure a more reasonable APR that made their monthly payments less painful, they’d more easily tolerate paying on that over-valued house. I their customers they deserve to get screwed especially by people in non-recourse states.have no outstanding debt other than my mortgage. No credit debt, no student loan, no car note - nothing. I can afford my house. But the 6.9 APR irks me. I’ve tried for months to get a MODIFIED better rate - something in the mid 4s. But because of no hardship and being underwater, the banks refuse. After 10 months of trying for a better rate I HAVE NO QUALMS walking away in a non-recourse state. For what - keeping an 800 FICO score? Screw that! The wife’s credit and our cash will secure the new home - a better house, larger, with a better APR - and the bank can bite me. Hell, when our old house goes up for auction maybe I’ll convince my brother to buy it for half its current cost. If banks like     , who egregiously borrowed tax payer money, are unwilling to help those same taxpayers who are


And they weren't the only ones.

I’m walking away because of the absurd policy of the bank. Let me explain:

Because of the economy, my income took a hit and I now make about two thirds less than what was the norm a few years ago. After exhausting a large safety net of savings, I declared bankruptcy. I have NEVER been late on my mortgage, it was always the first thing I paid but the bank now refuses to report my payment history to the credit bureaus after my bankruptcy. They cite it is their prerogative to do so, but if I was to reaffirm the debt, they would be happy to report my timely payments to the credit bureau, which would help me, rebuild my credit.

So I call an appraiser I know to get a feel as to what my home is worth and I find out that I am $160K upside down. So I basically can keep my home but not get any credit for never being late in payments or for continuing to be an on time customer, or I can walk away since after all the bankruptcy did discharge the debt. Also, after looking at a few rental homes, I can rent the same home for half what my mortgage payment is.

So let’s see, I can put a roof over my head for half the price monthly, walk away from $160K of negative equity, and the bank thinks they are doing me a favor by offering me a deal to start reporting to the bureaus in exchange for reaffirming the debt. Yea right!

The bank can keep the house and the loan is held by Fannie so they can sustain the loss. I will restore my credit by other methods. By the way, one of my cars was financed and I was also upside down in that and they tried the same tactic. I gave them back the car.

The logic used by these borrowers is skewed and not the logic used by normal people who have lost their jobs and homes against their will. It is, however, telling that people are proud to discuss how they're going to make everyone else pay (especially in the case of the Fannie loan). It seems the American dream isn't home ownership, it's getting the upper hand in every single way and "sticking it to the man". This, undoubtedly, is not what the Founding Fathers had in mind.


Posted by Leah Barr on October 27th, 2009 2:22 PMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
September sees 9.4% home sale increase
October 23rd, 2009 3:56 PM

New numbers show the impact the tax credit has had on first-time homebuyers achieving their own home. An article today from MSNBC gave insight into how this is effecting the housing market.

Home resales in September clocked the largest monthly increase in 26 years as buyers scrambled to complete their purchases before a tax credit for first-time owners expires.

Sales jumped 9.4 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.57 million last month, from a downwardly revised pace of 5.1 million in August, the National Association of Realtors said Friday.

That pace was the strongest in two years and beat Wall Street forecasts. Sales had been expected to rise to an annual rate of 5.35 million, according to economists surveyed by Thomson Reuters.

"There's a mini-boom going on in the housing market," said Thomas Popik, who conducts a monthly survey of real estate agents for Campbell Communications, a research firm.

Nationwide sales are up nearly 24 percent from their bottom in January, but are still down 23 percent from four years ago.

Prices, however, continued to be dragged down by foreclosures and short sales, where the mortgage exceeds the sales price. The median price last month was $174,900, down almost 9 percent from $191,200 a year earlier, and slightly lower than August's median of $177,300.

The inventory of unsold homes on the market fell about 7 percent to 3.63 million. That's less than an eight-month supply at the current sales pace, and the lowest level since March 2007.

Sales rose around the country, especially in the West, where they grew 13 percent from a month earlier. Foreclosure sales are booming in cities like Los Angeles, San Diego and Las Vegas.

First-time homebuyers and investors are snapping up those homes and taking advantage of low mortgage rates. These buyers can also take advantage of a tax credit of 10 percent of the sales price, up to $8,000, if the sale is completed by the end of November.

The concern is what will happen after November. Many buyers are very aware of how soon they need to close and seem to be pushing to make sure they get every penny.

The tax credit is so important to some buyers that they are adding a clause to their contracts, allowing them to back out if the sale doesn't close by Nov. 30. However, economists note that bargain-priced foreclosures and low mortgage rates are making a big contribution to the sales boom.

"We think the housing market has touched bottom and it is now only a matter of time until home prices stabilize — something that we anticipate to occur in late 2010," wrote Joseph LaVorgna, chief U.S. economist at Deutsche Bank.

Prices could fall further because rising unemployment leads to more foreclosures. The jobless rate, currently at 9.8 percent is expected to rise as high as 10.5 percent next year, causing more people to fall behind on their mortgages.

"There's more supply that's going to come into the marketplace," said Stan Humphries, chief economist at real estate Web site Zillow.com. "That additional supply will outpace demand."

With concerns about the housing market still prominent, Congress is considering several proposals to extend the tax credit for first-time buyers. Senators Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., and Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., want to extend it through June 30, and expand it to include all home buyers, at an estimated cost of $16.7 billion.

Although many are in favor of the extension, especially realtors and homebuilders, not everyone is as certain that the tax credit is as necessary.

"The group has an incentive to talk up the effects of the credit as it is urging Congress to extend it, and it therefore may be exaggerating the credit's effects," wrote Zach Pandl, an economist with Nomura Securities.


Posted by Leah Barr on October 23rd, 2009 3:56 PMPost a Comment (0)

Subscribe to this blog
Recent Posts:

Archive:

My Favorite Blogs:

Sites That Link to This Blog:

Appraisers of Las Vegas Appraises Houses to High-Rises.   Expert residential and commercial appraisals of all types of real estate by Nevada Licensed and Certified Residential and Certified General Commercial Appraisers in Las Vegas, Henderson, North Las Vegas, Boulder City, Clark County and all of Southern Nevada.  We also provide appraisals in the Clark County communities of Summerlin, Paradise, Aliante, Seven Hills, Anthem, Green Valley, Southern Highlands, Sun City, Spanish Trails, Spanish Hills, Rhodes Ranch and all of the local condo communities.


Stroy, LLC dba Appraisers of Las Vegas 2441 Tech Center Court #104 Las Vegas, NV 89128
Phone: Toll Free Phone: Cell: Fax:

Contact Us | Privacy Policy | HVCC Compliance | Client Login | Order an Appraisal | Home

Copyright © 2010 Stroy, LLC dba Appraisers of Las Vegas
Portions Copyright © 2010 a la mode, inc.
Another XSite by a la mode, inc. | Admin LoginTerms of UseSite Map